Anzeige
Mehr »
Login
Samstag, 23.11.2024 Börsentäglich über 12.000 News von 677 internationalen Medien
Microsofts, Googles und Amazons nukleares Wettrennen macht diese Uranaktie zu einem Muss!
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
Marketwired
369 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(0)

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation: New Analysis Highlights Benefits of Rent-Restricted Properties

Finanznachrichten News

MCLEAN, VA -- (Marketwired) -- 03/20/18 -- A new analysis by Freddie Mac (OTCQB: FMCC) has concluded that over the last five years, individuals living in apartments with rents restricted through the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program have saved thousands of dollars annually compared to similar, market-rate properties.

Authored by Freddie Mac Multifamily's Research and Modeling team, the new research looks at nine representative counties across the United States and concludes that in those areas, the average LIHTC restricted rent was 38 percent lower than the average market rate rent in 2017. The paper goes on to point out that, averaged across the surveyed markets, a renter in a market-rate, two-bedroom unit spent $7,500 more per year than a renter in a similar LIHTC property. In higher cost areas, this difference totaled more than $22,000.

"Our analysis shows that in a given year, renters living in LIHTC and other rent-restricted properties can save thousands -- even tens of thousands -- of dollars in rent," said Steve Guggenmos, vice president of Research and Modeling for Freddie Mac Multifamily. "Our research shows that while rent growth in restricted properties has been measured and predictable, market-rate rents have grown quickly and unevenly, because rental housing demand exceeds supply. It also illustrates the hardship faced by families who qualify for rent-restricted properties but cannot find a unit due to lack of supply -- a reality that can cost an already-struggling family substantial sums of money."

The paper compares average market-rate rents against restricted rents for two-bedroom units in nine counties across the country (see below), looking at four in-depth. It concludes that between 2012 and 2017, market rent increases ranged from 1.6 percent to 7.9 percent annually. This averaged 5 percent annually. Annual rent spikes of more than 7 percent took place in seven of the markets.

During the same period, restricted rents saw stable and measured growth. Changes ranged from -0.7 percent to 3.2 percent annually, and averaged 0.9 percent per year. The greatest annual rent spike was less than 5.5 percent. This means that in 2017, a tenant in a market-rate unit spent anywhere from $7,500 to $22,000 more per year than a tenant in a similar, LIHTC-restricted rent unit. While restricted rentals will continue to be much more affordable, the paper does predict that formulas determining restricted rents suggest increases in the coming two years.

According to the paper: "Renters in units with restricted rents enjoy significant benefits over their counterparts in market-rate housing, many of whom qualify for restricted rents but due to the lack of available supply are unable to benefit...For those households that qualified for, but were unable to move into rent-restricted housing, the substantial market-rate rent increases since 2012 are causing serious financial hardship."

Annualized County Rent Growth Rate Comparison, 2012-2017

Rent     Restricted Market-Rate
        County            Metro Area     Calculation    Rents       Rents
--------------------- ------------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
Bernalillo County, NM   Albuquerque, NM    60% AMI       0.0%        2.2%
 Davidson County, TN     Nashville, TN     60% AMI       0.5%        7.9%
 Hennepin County, MN    Minneapolis, MN    60% AMI       1.5%        5.9%
  Hudson County, NJ      New York, NY      40% FMR       3.2%        1.6%
 Los Angeles County,    Los Angeles, CA    40% FMR       1.3%        5.7%
          CA
  Orange County, FL       Orlando, FL      60% AMI       0.1%        5.5%
 Riverside County, CA   Los Angeles, CA    40% FMR      -0.7%        4.9%
 Salt Lake County, UT Salt Lake City, UT   60% AMI       1.1%        5.6%
  Travis County, TX       Austin, TX       60% AMI       1.4%        6.2%
--------------------- ------------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
  9 County Average:                                      0.9%        5.0%

Sources: Freddie Mac, Yardi Matrix, Axiometrics, and Novogradac & Co.

The paper can be viewed here.

Freddie Mac Multifamily is the nation's multifamily housing finance leader. Historically, nearly 90 percent of the eligible rental homes we fund are affordable to families with low to moderate incomes.

Freddie Mac makes home possible for millions of families and individuals by providing mortgage capital to lenders. Since our creation by Congress in 1970, we've made housing more accessible and affordable for homebuyers and renters in communities nationwide. We are building a better housing finance system for homebuyers, renters, lenders and taxpayers. Learn more at FreddieMac.com, Twitter @FreddieMac and Freddie Mac's blog FreddieMac.com/blog.

Christopher Spina
703-388-7031
Christopher_Spina@freddiemac.com


© 2018 Marketwired
5 heiße Wetten für den Jahresendspurt!
Nach dem unerwartet schnellen Ende der US-Wahlen mit dem Sieg des republikanischen Kandidaten Donald Trump fackelten die Aktien- und Krypto- Märkte ein wahres Kursfeuerwerk ab und bliesen zur Jahresendrallye.

Im aktuellen kostenlosen Report beleuchten wir 5 aussichtsreiche Unternehmen, die das Fundament besitzen, in den nächsten Monaten den breiten Markt zu schlagen.

Seien Sie dabei!

Fordern Sie jetzt unseren brandneuen neuen Spezialreport an und erfahren Sie, welche Aktien aufgrund ihrer Bewertung sowie charttechnischen Situation das Potenzial zu einer Outperformance besitzen.

Handeln Sie jetzt und sichern Sie sich Ihren kostenfreien Report!
Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.