Anzeige
Mehr »
Login
Mittwoch, 20.11.2024 Börsentäglich über 12.000 News von 677 internationalen Medien
Von Solarenergie zu digitalen Assets: Die Strategie hinter einer 75-Prozent-Rallye
Anzeige

Indizes

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Aktien

Kurs

%
News
24 h / 7 T
Aufrufe
7 Tage

Xetra-Orderbuch

Fonds

Kurs

%

Devisen

Kurs

%

Rohstoffe

Kurs

%

Themen

Kurs

%

Erweiterte Suche
ACCESSWIRE
678 Leser
Artikel bewerten:
(2)

Silver Tiger Metals Inc.: Silver Tiger Announces Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the El Tigre Silver-Gold Project

Finanznachrichten News

HALIFAX, NS / ACCESSWIRE / September 12, 2023 / Silver Tiger Metals Inc. (TSXV:SLVR)(OTCQX:SLVTF) ("Silver Tiger" or the "Corporation") is pleased to announce an Updated Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for its 100% owned, high-grade silver-gold El Tigre Project (the "Project" or "El Tigre") located in Sonora, Mexico. This Updated MRE was based on information and data supplied by Silver Tiger, and was undertaken by Yungang Wu, P.Geo. and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET of P&E Mining Consultants Inc. of Brampton, Ontario.

The Updated MRE includes the newly-discovered Sulfide and Black Shale Zones, Veins and Pit-Constrained Resources (Figure 1).

Highlights Include:

  • Increase of 84% in Indicated Silver Equivalent ("AgEq") Ounces from initial September 2017 Mineral Resource, with 3% increase in AgEq grade;
  • Increase of 257% in Inferred AgEq Ounces from initial September 2017 Mineral Resource, with an 13% increase in AgEq grade;
  • Pit-constrained El Tigre Indicated Mineral Resources of 61.4 Million ounces (Moz) AgEq grading 44 g/t AgEq contained in 43.0Million tonnes ("Mt");
  • Pit-constrained El Tigre Inferred Mineral Resources of 20.0 Moz AgEq grading 54 g/t AgEq contained in 11.5 Mt;
  • Out-of-Pit El Tigre Indicated Mineral Resources of 20.8 Moz AgEq grading 279 g/t AgEq contained in 2.3 Mt;
  • Out-of-Pit El Tigre Inferred Mineral Resources of 69.8 Moz AgEq grading 235 g/t AgEq contained in 9.2 Mt;
  • Out-of-Pit Indicated Mineral Resources, at a cut-off grade of 263 g/t AgEq (3.5 gpt AuEq), contains 12.8 Moz ounces AgEq grading 484 g/t AgEq within in 0.8 Mt;
  • Out-of-Pit Inferred Mineral Resources, at a cut-off grade of 263 g/t AgEq (3.5 gpt AuEq), contains 32.4 Moz ounces AgEq grading 400 g/t AgEq within in 2.5 Mt; and
  • The El Tigre Project Mineral Resource is amenable to both open pit and bulk underground mining methods;

Indicated Mineral Resources are estimated at 46.4 Mt grading 25 g/t silver, 0.39 g/t gold, 0.01% copper, 0.03% lead, and 0.06% zinc (0.77 g/t AuEq). The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes Indicated Mineral Resources of 37.2 Moz of silver, 575 koz of gold, 9.4 Mlb of copper, 35.5 Mlb of lead, and 64.3 Mlb of zinc (1.1 Moz AuEq).

Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated at 20.9 Mt grading 78.4 g/t silver, 0.56 g/t gold, 0.04% copper, 0.13% lead, and 0.22% zinc (1.79 g/t AuEq). The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes Inferred Mineral Resources of 52.6 Moz of silver, 374 koz of gold, 18.1 Mlb of copper, 59.7 Mlb of lead, and 103.4 Mlb of zinc (1.2 Moz AuEq).

Preliminary Economic Assessment

As previously announced, Silver Tiger expects to deliver its PEA during September 2023.

Glenn Jessome, President and CEO, stated: "I would like to thank our technical team and our external consultants for delivering this positive Mineral Resource Estimate. The discovery of the Shale and Sulphide Zones, increased tonnage in the Veins and further delineation of the Open Pit has greatly increased the Mineral Resource and grade since our last published Technical Report. We have now delineated approximately 37.2 million ounces of silver and 575 thousand ounces of gold in the Indicated category, and 52.6 million ounces of silver and 374 thousand ounces of gold in the Inferred category." Mr. Jessome further stated: "With this successful MRE being complete, we now turn our attention to economics. As previously announced, we expect to deliver our PEA in Q4 2023. This coming milestone will see Silver Tiger transition from an explorer to a developer. This transition could significantly increase shareholder value."

A Technical Report is being prepared on the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 ("NI-43-101"), and will be available on the Company's website and SEDAR within 45 days of the date of this release. The effective date of this Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is September 12, 2023.

Figure 1: Isometric View of Mineralized Domains used in 2023 updated Mineral Resource Estimate.

Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology - El Tigre Project

A total of 482 drill holes (124,851 metres) and 3,160 surface and adit channel samples (6,473 metres) were used in the Mineral Resource Estimate. Historical underground chip samples from the El Tigre Mine, totaling 16,319, were used to define the vein limits only and not grade estimation.

P&E Mining Consultants Inc. ("P&E") collaborated with Silver Tiger personnel to develop the mineralization models, estimates, and reporting criteria for the Mineral Resources at El Tigre. Mineralization models were initially developed by Silver Tiger and were reviewed and modified by P&E. A total of twenty-three individual mineralized domains have been identified through drilling and surface sampling. The outlines of the halos and veins below surface from 0 to 100 m were influenced by the selection of mineralized material above 0.3 g/t AuEq, whereas 1.0 g/t AuEq was applied for the veins >100 m below surface that demonstrated lithological and structural zonal continuity along strike and down-dip.

Mineralization wireframes were used as hard boundaries for the purposes of grade estimation. A 5 m x 5 m x 5 m three-dimensional block model was used for the Mineral Resource Estimate. The block model consists of estimated Au, Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn grades, estimated bulk density, classification criteria, and a block volume inclusion percent factor. Au and Ag equivalent block grades were subsequently calculated from the estimated metal grades.

Sample assays were composited to a 1.5m standard length. Au, Ag, Cu, Pb and Zn grades were estimated using Inverse Distance Cubed weighting of between 1 and 12 composites, with a maximum of 2 composites per drill hole. Composites were capped prior to estimation by mineralization domain. Composite samples were selected within an anisotropic search ellipse oriented down the plunge of identified high grade trends.

A total of 5,699 bulk density analyses were provided in the drill hole database. The bulk density ranged from 1.6 (dump) to 3.02 t/m 3 in the mineralized wireframes.

Classification criteria were determined from observed grade and geological continuity as well as variography. Indicated Mineral Resources are informed by 2 or more drill holes within 50 m; Inferred Mineral Resources are informed by 1 or more drill holes with a search radius sufficient to populate the wireframes. No Measured Mineral Resources were calculated.

P&E is of the opinion that the Mineral Resource Estimates are suitable for public reporting and are a reasonable representation of the mineralization and metal content of the El Tigre Deposit.

Table 1: El Tigre Project 2023 Mineral Resources Statement (1-10)

Deposit

Tonnes

Average Grade

Contained Metal

Au

Ag

Cu

Pb

Zn

AuEq

AgEq

Au

Ag

Cu

Pb

Zn

AuEq

AgEq

(M)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(koz)

(koz)

(Mlb)

(Mlb)

(Mlb)

(koz)

(koz)

Indicated:

South Zone In Pit

43.0

0.39

14

0.01

0.02

0.59

44

535

20,049

1.8

7.0

14.3

818

61,381

South Zone Out-of-Pit

1.8

0.28

200

0.18

0.59

1.02

3.83

287

16

11,453

7.2

23.1

40.1

219

16,403

North Zone Out-of-Pit

0.5

0.72

158

0.04

0.41

0.80

3.36

252

13

2,777

0.4

4.9

9.7

59

4,435

Out of Pit Total

2.3

0.38

191

0.15

0.55

0.97

3.72

279

29

14,231

7.6

28.0

49.8

278

20,838

Vein (S & N) Total

45.3

0.39

24

0.01

0.04

0.06

0.75

56

564

34,280

9.4

35.0

64.1

1,096

82,219

Low Grade Stockpile

0.1

0.9

177

0.02

0.22

0.50

3.41

255

3

588

0.1

0.5

0.2

11

847

Tailings

0.9

0.27

78

1.30

98

8

2,345

39

2,948

Total Indicated

46.4

0.39

25

0.01

0.03

0.06

0.77

58

575

37,212

9.4

35.5

64.3

1,147

86,014

Inferred:

South Zone In Pit

11.5

0.47

17

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.72

54

176

6,396

0.8

3.7

4.3

267

20,045

South Zone Out-of-Pit

5.5

0.61

170

0.09

0.22

0.39

3.23

242

107

30,072

10.7

26.9

46.8

571

42,821

North Zone Out-of-Pit

3.7

0.74

132

0.08

0.35

0.64

3.00

225

89

15,813

6.6

29.0

52.3

360

26,981

Out of Pit Total

9.2

0.66

155

0.09

0.27

0.49

3.14

235

197

45,885

17.3

55.9

99.0

931

69,801

Vein (S & N) Total

20.8

0.56

78

0.04

0.13

0.23

1.80

135

373

52,282

18.1

59.6

103.4

1,198

89,847

Low Grade Stockpile

0.0

0.46

146

0.02

0.17

0.09

2.52

189

0

83

0.1

1

108

Tailings

0.1

0.27

79

1.31

98

1

254

4

323

Total Inferred

20.9

0.56

78

0.04

0.13

0.22

1.79

135

373

52,619

18.1

59.7

103.4

1,204

90,277

1. Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves, do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental,

permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.

2. The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.

It is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued exploration.

3.The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources

and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (2014) prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council and CIM Best Practices (2019).

4. Historically mined areas were depleted from the Mineral Resource model.

5. Approximately 74.7% of the Indicated and 22.3% of the Inferred contained AgEq ounces are pit constrained, with the remainder out-of-pit. See tables 2 and 3 for details of the split

between pit constrained and out-of-pit deposits.

6. The pit constrained AuEq cut-off grade of 0.14 g/t was derived from US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, 80% process recovery for Ag and Au, US$5.30/tonne process cost and

US$1.00/tonne G&A cost. The constraining pit optimization parameters were $1.86/t mineralized mining cost, $1.86/t waste mining cost and 50-degree pit slopes.

7. The out-of-pit AuEq cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t AuEq was derived from US$1,800/oz Au price, US$24/oz Ag price, $4.00$/lb Cu, $0.95 $/lb Pb, $1.40 $/lb Zn, 85% process recovery for all

metals, $50/t mining cost, US$20/tonne process and US$4 G&A cost. The out-of-pit Mineral Resource grade blocks were quantified above the 1.5 g/t AuEq cut-off, below the constraining

pit shell within the constraining mineralized wireframes and exhibited sufficient continuity to be considered for cut and fill and long hole mining

8. No Mineral Resources are classified as Measured.

9. AgEq and AuEq calculated at an Ag/Au ratio of 75:1.

10. Totals may not agree due to rounding

Table 2: AuEq Cut-off Sensitivities - Pit Constrained Mineral Resource 1

Cut-offTonnesAverage GradeContained Metal
Pit Constrained(AuEq)AuAgCuPbZnAuEqAgEqAuAgCuPbZnAuEqAgEq
(g/t)(M)(g/t)(g/t)(%)(%)(%)(g/t)(g/t)(koz)(koz)(Mlb)(Mlb)(Mlb)(koz)(koz)
Indicated0.5016.80.64290.0030.010.021.0477.7734415,6151.03.96.756142,045
0.4519.20.60260.0030.010.020.9772.4537216,2751.14.37.559844,820
0.4022.30.56240.0020.010.020.8966.9140316,9791.24.78.563947,929
0.3525.60.53210.0020.010.020.8261.8343317,6811.35.19.567950,956
0.3030.00.48190.0020.010.020.7556.3746618,4881.45.610.872554,368
0.2534.50.45170.0020.010.020.6951.7149519,1591.66.112.176457,336
0.2038.70.42160.0020.010.020.6447.9351819,6591.76.613.279559,618
0.1443.00.39150.0020.010.020.5944.4053520,0491.87.014.381861,381
0.1045.80.37140.0020.010.010.5642.2554320,2151.97.215.082962,183
0.0548.40.35130.0020.010.010.5440.2554820,3201.97.415.683662,673
Inferred0.505.40.75310.0050.020.021.1988.891315,3710.62.92.120615,443
0.455.90.72290.0050.020.021.1284.221365,5110.63.02.321416,037
0.406.60.67270.0040.020.021.0578.621445,6620.63.12.622316,762
0.357.50.63240.0040.020.020.9772.641525,8290.73.22.923417,568
0.308.60.58220.0040.020.020.8966.571605,9990.73.43.424618,413
0.259.80.53200.0040.020.020.8160.871686,2040.83.53.825619,221
0.2010.70.50180.0030.020.020.7657.181736,3240.83.64.126319,715
0.1411.50.47170.0030.010.020.7254.101766,3960.83.74.326720,045
0.1011.80.47170.0030.010.020.7153.061776,4150.83.74.426820,124
0.0512.00.46170.0030.010.020.7052.141776,4220.83.74.526920,167

  1. See Table 1 notes for assumptions

Table 3: AuEq Cut-off Sensitivities - Out-of-Pit Mineral Resource 1

Cut-off

Tonnes

Average Grade

Contained Metal

Out of Pit

(AuEq)

Au

Ag

Cu

Pb

Zn

AuEq

AgEq

Au

Ag

Cu

Pb

Zn

AuEq

AgEq

(g/t)

(M)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(g/t)

(koz)

(koz)

(Mlb)

(Mlb)

(Mlb)

(koz)

(koz)

South Zone-Indicated

5.0

0.4

0.46

426

0.46

1.39

2.45

8.27

620

6

5,291

3.9

11.8

20.9

103

7,699

4.5

0.5

5

0.45

398

0.42

1.28

2.29

7.71

579

7

5,849

4.2

12.9

23.1

114

8,514

4.0

0.6

0.43

369

0.38

1.18

2.12

7.15

536

8

6,479

4.6

14.2

215.6

25.6

126

9,422

3.5

0.7

0.40

339

0.35

1.07

1.91

6.56

492

9

7,218

5.1

15.6

27.9

140

10,462

3.0

0.8

0.38

310

0.31

0.96

1.71

5.97

447

10

8,015

5.5

17.0

30.3

154

11,570

2.5

1.0

0.35

279

0.27

0.84

1.50

5.36

402

11

8,894

5.9

18.4

32.7

171

12,798

2.0

1.3

0.32

244

0.23

0.72

1.28

4.66

350

13

9,992

6.5

20.4

35.9

191

14,334

1.5

1.8

0.28

201

0.18

0.59

1.02

3.83

287

16

11,453

7.2

23.1

40.1

219

16,403

1.0

2.8

0.26

147

0.13

0.43

0.74

2.86

214

24

13,409

8.2

27.0

45.9

260

19,517

South Zone-Inferred

5.0

0.8

0.80

375

0.21

0.50

0.86

6.60

495

20

9,224

3.5

8.4

14.5

163

12,192

4.5

1.2

0.66

345

0.17

0.46

0.79

5.99

449

25

12,898

4.5

11.8

20.3

224

16,780

4.0

1.4

0.68

325

0.17

0.46

0.78

5.71

429

30

14,409

5.0

14.0

23.7

253

18,993

3.5

1.6

0.70

300

0.15

0.45

0.77

5.38

404

37

15,999

5.6

16.3

28.1

287

21,495

3.0

2.4

0.60

269

0.14

0.36

0.62

4.75

356

47

20,765

7.5

18.8

33.0

368

27,564

2.5

3.0

0.70

235

0.12

0.31

0.54

4.34

326

68

22,922

8.3

20.7

36.3

422

31,684

2.0

3.8

0.67

210

0.11

0.27

0.48

3.91

293

82

25,649

9.3

22.8

39.9

478

35,825

1.5

5.5

0.61

170

0.09

0.22

0.39

3.23

242

107

30,072

10.7

26.9

46.8

571

42,821

1.0

10.4

0.48

116

0.06

0.17

0.29

2.28

171

162

38,814

14.4

39.1

65.7

767

57,529

North Zone-Indicated

5.0

0.1

1.98

382

0.08

0.56

1.08

7.83

587

5

1,018

0.1

1.0

0

2.0

21

1,564

4.5

0.1

1.76

359

0.07

0.57

1.09

7.31

548

6

1,151

0.2

1.2

2.4

23

1,755

4.0

0.1

1.59

59

332

0.07

0.54

1.05

6.74

505

6

1,302

0.2

1.5

2.8

27

1,984

3.5

0.2

1.38

297

0.06

0.53

1.01

6.03

452

7

1,522

0.2

1.9

3.9

31

2,322

3.0

0.2

1.16

259

0.05

0.53

1.02

5.30

398

8

1,805

0.3

2.5

4.9

37

2,769

2.5

0.3

1.00

226

0.05

0.53

1.04

4.70

352

9

2,060

0.3

3.3

6.5

43

3,211

2.0

0.4

0.85

192

0.04

0.47

0.93

4.02

301

11

2,404

0.3

4.1

8.0

50

3,784

1.5

0.5

0.72

158

0.04

0.41

0.80

3.36

252

13

2,777

0.4

4.9

9.7

59

4,435

1.0

0.9

0.57

116

0.03

0.31

0.61

2.52

189

16

3,349

0.5

6.2

11.9

72

5,433

North Zone-Inferred

5.0

0.4

2.12

339

0.04

0.13

0.23

6.83

512

26

4,171

0.3

1.1

1.9

84

6,304

4.5

0.4

2.05

324

0.04

0.15

0.23

6.58

493

29

4,544

0.3

1.4

2.2

92

6,909

4.0

0.5

1.91

301

0.03

0.16

0.23

6.12

459

33

5,228

0.4

1.9

2.8

106

7,975

3.5

0.9

1.54

264

0.03

0.16

0.21

5.25

393

43

7,328

0.6

3.0

3.9

145

10,905

3.0

1.5

1.12

203

0.07

0.41

0.82

4.42

332

54

9,756

2.4

13.6

27.1

212

15,913

2.5

1.9

1.06

187

0.06

0.37

0.73

4.07

305

64

11,318

2.6

15.6

30.4

247

18,490

2.0

2.5

0.95

166

0.05

0.35

0.67

3.64

273

75

13,114

2.9

18.7

36.1

287

21,560

1.5

3.7

0.74

132

0.08

0.35

0.64

3.00

225

89

15,813

6.6

29.0

52.3

360

26,981

1.0

4.7

0.65

115

0.07

0.31

0.55

2.62

197

100

17,524

7.6

32.4

57.7

400

29,979

  1. See Table 1 notes for assumptions

Qualified Persons

Dave Duncan P. Geo., VP Exploration of Silver Tiger, Charles Spath, P. Geo., VP of Technical Services of Silver Tiger, and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC, CET, President of P&E Mining Consultants are the Qualified Persons as defined under National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Duncan, Mr. Spath and Mr. Puritch have reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information in this press release.

About Silver Tiger and the El Tigre Historic Mine District

Silver Tiger Metals Inc. is a Canadian company whose management has more than 25 years' experience discovering, financing and building large epithermal silver projects in Mexico. Silver Tiger's 100% owned 28,414 hectare Historic El Tigre Mining District is located in Sonora, Mexico. Principled environmental, social and governance practices are core priorities at Silver Tiger.

The El Tigre historic mine district is located in Sonora, Mexico and lies at the northern end of the Sierra Madre silver and gold belt which hosts many epithermal silver and gold deposits, including Dolores, Santa Elena and Las Chispas at the northern end. In 1896, gold was first discovered on the property in the Gold Hill area and mining started with the Brown Shaft in 1903. The focus soon changed to mining high-grade silver veins in the area with production coming from 3 parallel veins the El Tigre Vein, the Seitz Kelley Vein and the Sooy Vein. Underground mining on the middle El Tigre Vein extended 1,450 metres along strike and was mined on 14 levels to a depth of approximately 450 metres. The Seitz Kelley Vein was mined along strike for 1 kilometre to a depth of approximately 200 meters. The Sooy Vein was only mined along strike for 250 metres to a depth of approximately 150 metres. Mining abruptly stopped on all 3 of these veins when the price of silver collapsed to less than 20¢ per ounce with the onset of the Great Depression. By the time the mine closed in 1930, it is reported to have produced a total of 353,000 ounces of gold and 67.4 million ounces of silver from 1.87 million tons (Craig, 2012). The average grade mined during this period was over 2 kilograms silver equivalent per ton.

For further information, please contact:

Glenn Jessome
President and CEO
902 492 0298
jessome@silvertigermetals.com

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT:

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This News Release includes certain "forward-looking statements". All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding potential mineralization, Mineral Resources and Reserves, the ability to convert Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated Mineral Resources, the ability to complete future drilling programs and infill sampling, the ability to extend resource blocks, the similarity of mineralization at El Tigre to Delores, Santa Elena and Chispas, exploration results, and future plans and objectives of Silver Tiger, are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as "may", "is expected to", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends", "plans", "projection", "could", "vision", "goals", "objective" and "outlook" and other similar words. Although Silver Tiger believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Silver Tiger's expectations include risks and uncertainties related to exploration, development, operations, commodity prices and global financial volatility, risk and uncertainties of operating in a foreign jurisdiction as well as additional risks described from time to time in the filings made by Silver Tiger with securities regulators.

SOURCE: Silver Tiger Metals Inc.


View source version on accesswire.com:
https://www.accesswire.com/783087/silver-tiger-announces-updated-mineral-resource-estimate-for-the-el-tigre-silver-gold-project

© 2023 ACCESSWIRE
Nach Nvidia: 5 KI-Revolutionäre aus der zweiten Reihe!
Künstliche Intelligenz hat spätestens nach dem Raketenstart von Chat GPT das Leben aller verändert. Doch der Superzyklus steht nach Meinungen von Experten erst am Anfang. Während Aktien wie Nvidia von der ersten Aufwärtsentwicklung stark profitieren konnten, versprechen aussichtsreiche Player aus der

zweiten Reihe noch enormes Aufwärtspotenzial.

Im kostenlosen, exklusiven Spezialreport präsentieren wir ihnen 5 innovative KI-Unternehmen, die bahnbrechende Entwicklungen in diesem Sektor prägen könnten.

Warum sollten Sie dabei sein?
Trotz der jüngsten Erfolge steht die Entwicklung der künstlichen Intelligenz noch am Beginn eines neuen Superzyklus. Experten gehen davon aus, dass der Sektor bis 2032 global auf 1,3 Billionen US-Dollar explodieren wird, wobei ein großer Teil auf Hardware und Infrastruktur entfallen wird.

Nutzen Sie die Chance!
Fordern Sie sofort unseren brandneuen Spezialreport an und erfahren Sie, welche 5 KI-Aktien das größte Potenzial zur Vervielfachung besitzen. Dieser Report ist komplett kostenlos und zeigt Ihnen die aussichtsreichsten Investments im KI-Sektor.
Handeln Sie jetzt und sichern Sie sich Ihren kostenfreien Report!

Werbehinweise: Die Billigung des Basisprospekts durch die BaFin ist nicht als ihre Befürwortung der angebotenen Wertpapiere zu verstehen. Wir empfehlen Interessenten und potenziellen Anlegern den Basisprospekt und die Endgültigen Bedingungen zu lesen, bevor sie eine Anlageentscheidung treffen, um sich möglichst umfassend zu informieren, insbesondere über die potenziellen Risiken und Chancen des Wertpapiers. Sie sind im Begriff, ein Produkt zu erwerben, das nicht einfach ist und schwer zu verstehen sein kann.