University of Virginia Takes the Top Spot While Harvard, Columbia and NYU Share an 'Abysmal' Free Speech Status
WASHINGTON, DC / ACCESSWIRE / September 5, 2024 / This year's College Free Speech Rankings - released today by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and College Pulse - offer comprehensive insights into the state of free speech on America's college campuses.
The largest report of its kind, the rankings draw from more than 58,000 student responses representing more than 250 colleges and universities nationwide. The report arrives at a time when protest over the Israel-Hamas war has put campus speech concerns at the forefront of the national conversation for nearly a year.
"These rankings highlight a pivotal moment in higher education, where the tension between maintaining a free speech environment and navigating deeply polarizing issues is more pronounced than ever," said FIRE CEO Greg Lukianoff.
"The Middle East crisis plunged campuses into absolute chaos last academic year and administrators largely failed in their response, clamping down on free speech protections instead of fostering spaces for open dialogue," Lukianoff added. "The nightmare scenarios of last spring cannot be repeated this fall. Colleges need to reassert their mantle of being marketplaces of ideas, not bubbles of groupthink and censorship."
The best colleges for free speech:
University of Virginia
Michigan Technological University
Florida State University
Eastern Kentucky University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Claremont McKenna College
North Carolina State University
Oregon State University
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Mississippi State University
The worst colleges for free speech:
Pomona College
Indiana University
University of Texas, Austin
University of Southern California
Syracuse University
Barnard College
University of Pennsylvania
New York University
Columbia University
Harvard University
For the first time, the University of Virginia has claimed the top spot in the rankings, followed closely by Michigan Technological University, which came in first last year, and Florida State University in third. Eastern Kentucky University and Georgia Tech round out the top five.
Harvard University retained its position as the lowest-ranked institution for free speech for the second consecutive year. Harvard, Columbia University, and New York University all received an "Abysmal" rating for their speech climates. The University of Pennsylvania and Barnard College round out the bottom five. These schools not only have low levels of administrative support for free speech. They also have low levels of student comfort in expressing their views on controversial political topics and a strong bias in favor of allowing liberal speakers on campus over conservative ones.
"The lack of administrative support for free speech trickles down into student behavior," said FIRE Vice President of Research Angela C. Erickson. "How many more students will be blocked from attending speeches, and how many more speakers will be shouted down or even attacked?"
Other key findings from the rankings report include:
52% of students reported that blocking other students from attending a campus speech is at least "rarely" acceptable, up from 45% last year and 37% two years ago.
55% of students find it difficult to discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on campus. This is a record high for any issue since the rankings began.
42% of students believe that it is only "somewhat" clear that their administration protects free speech, while 24% believe it is "not at all" or "not very" clear.
This year, 17% of students said they feel like they cannot express their opinion on a subject because of how students, a professor or the administration would respond. This is a bit of positive news, since last year this percentage was 20%, and in 2022 it was 22%.
Very conservative students reported self-censoring most often, with 34% saying they do so "very" or "fairly" often. 24% percent of somewhat conservative students reported self-censoring "very" or "fairly" often. In contrast, only 15% of very liberal students reported self-censoring "very" or "fairly" often. 12% of somewhat liberal students and 13% of slightly liberal students said the same.
"While it's encouraging to see some progress in reducing student self-censorship, the persistence of deplatformings and challenges posed by the Middle East conflict underscore the need for continued vigilance in protecting free expression on campus," said FIRE Chief Research Advisor Sean Stevens.
Explore the full rankings here.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought - the most essential qualities of liberty. FIRE recognizes that colleges and universities play a vital role in preserving free thought within a free society. To this end, we place a special emphasis on defending the individual rights of students and faculty members on our nation's campuses, including freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience.
Contact Information
Bridget Lewis
Senior Account Executive
bridget@javelindc.com
7027732111
SOURCE: Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression
View the original press release on newswire.com.
